Unlock your potential with Stronger Minded! Explore our resources for science based mental strength and emotional balance.

Cart

What music enhances productivity? Strategies for optimal work music selection.

Why Your Music Choice Matters More Than You Think

Every day, millions of people reach for their headphones before starting work, instinctively believing that the right soundtrack will help them focus. They’re not wrong—but they’re probably not optimizing their music choices either.

Music’s impact on work performance isn’t universal. The same playlist that helps one person enter deep focus might completely derail another’s concentration. Your task type, personality, musical training, and even your current mood determine whether music enhances or impairs your cognitive performance (Kämpfe et al., 2011).

The stakes are higher than you might expect. Research shows that inappropriate music choices can reduce task performance by 10-15%, while optimal selections can improve productivity, mood, and work quality (Lesiuk, 2005).

This guide synthesizes decades of research on music and cognition to help you understand what music genuinely enhances different types of work—and when silence might serve you better.

How Music Affects Your Working Brain

Before diving into specific recommendations, understanding music’s neurological impact helps explain why certain choices work better than others.

The Cognitive Load Problem

Your brain has limited processing capacity. When you work on demanding tasks, music competes for the same cognitive resources—particularly verbal and auditory processing channels (Furnham & Bradley, 1997).

Simple music with minimal variation places little demand on attention, allowing cognitive resources to remain focused on work. Complex music—especially with lyrics—hijacks attention repeatedly, fragmenting focus and reducing task performance (Perham & Currie, 2014).

The Arousal and Mood Regulation Hypothesis

Music influences physiological arousal and emotional state. Upbeat music increases arousal, heart rate, and energy levels, while slower music promotes calmness and relaxation (Karageorghis & Priest, 2012).

For mundane, repetitive tasks, music provides stimulation that prevents boredom and maintains engagement. For complex cognitive work, music can regulate anxiety and create optimal arousal levels—neither too anxious nor too relaxed (Lesiuk, 2005).

Dopamine and the Reward System

Music activates your brain’s reward circuitry, releasing dopamine in response to pleasurable sounds. This neurochemical response enhances mood, motivation, and can create positive associations with work tasks (Salimpoor et al., 2011).

Familiar music you enjoy produces more pronounced dopamine release, explaining why your favorite songs boost motivation even if they’re not “optimal” for concentration.

The Irrelevant Sound Effect

Any changing auditory stimulus—even if you’re not consciously attending to it—can disrupt cognitive processes, particularly those involving working memory and reading comprehension. This “irrelevant sound effect” explains why unexpected sounds or attention-grabbing music breaks concentration (Jones et al., 1999).

Predictable, steady-state music minimizes this effect, while songs with dynamic variation, sudden changes, or compelling lyrics maximize disruption.

Music for Deep Focus and Concentration

When your work demands sustained attention and complex cognitive processing, music selection becomes critical.

Best Music Characteristics for Focused Work

Moderate tempo (60-80 beats per minute): Matches resting heart rate and promotes calm focus without inducing drowsiness (Rauscher et al., 1993).

Minimal lyrics: Instrumental music avoids linguistic interference with reading, writing, and verbal reasoning tasks (Perham & Currie, 2014).

Consistent dynamics: Steady volume and predictable progression prevent attention-grabbing surprises that break concentration (Thompson et al., 2012).

Familiar but not too engaging: Music familiar enough that it doesn’t demand active listening, but not so captivating that it draws attention away from work (Shih et al., 2009).

Optimal Genres for Deep Work

Classical music: Particularly Baroque compositions (Bach, Vivaldi, Handel) feature structured, predictable patterns at 60-70 BPM that enhance concentration without distraction (Rauscher et al., 1993).

Ambient and drone music: Artists like Brian Eno created “music for thinking” specifically designed to enhance environments without commanding attention. Minimal melodic variation creates sonic wallpaper that masks distracting sounds (Eno, 1978).

Lo-fi hip hop: The “study beats” phenomenon isn’t accidental. Lo-fi hip hop typically features repetitive beats, minimal lyrics, moderate tempo, and intentional imperfections that prevent music from becoming too engaging (Krause et al., 2019).

Video game soundtracks: Composers design game music to maintain engagement during extended focus periods without distracting from gameplay—making these soundtracks ideal for work requiring sustained concentration (Zehnder & Lipscomb, 2006).

Nature sounds and white noise: While not technically music, natural soundscapes (rain, ocean waves, forest sounds) mask environmental noise while providing rhythmic, non-linguistic audio that many find enhances focus (Saadatmand et al., 2013).

The Mozart Effect: Myth vs. Reality

Popular media sensationalized early research suggesting Mozart’s music increases intelligence. While the dramatic “Mozart Effect” claims don’t hold up to scrutiny, moderate evidence suggests that listening to Mozart (or other classical music) before cognitive tasks may provide small, temporary improvements in spatial reasoning—likely through arousal and mood enhancement rather than anything specific to Mozart (Chabris, 1999).

For work purposes, any music you enjoy that meets the criteria above will likely work as well as Mozart.

Music for Creative Work

Creative tasks requiring divergent thinking, idea generation, and novel connections respond differently to music than analytical work.

Why Creative Work Tolerates More Musical Complexity

Creative thinking often benefits from moderate cognitive distraction. While it seems counterintuitive, slight disruption to linear thinking patterns can facilitate unexpected associations and creative insights (Mehta et al., 2012).

Research shows that moderate ambient noise (around 70 decibels—typical coffee shop levels) enhances creative performance compared to silence or high noise levels (Mehta et al., 2012).

Best Music Characteristics for Creative Work

Moderate complexity: Music engaging enough to provide stimulation but not so complex it overwhelms cognitive capacity (Mehta et al., 2012).

Positive mood induction: Uplifting, pleasant music enhances creative thinking by promoting approach-oriented mindsets and cognitive flexibility (Isen et al., 1987).

Varied but not jarring: Some variation maintains engagement, but dramatic shifts still disrupt cognitive flow (Ritter & Ferguson, 2017).

Optimal Music for Creative Tasks

Upbeat indie and alternative: Moderately complex songs with interesting arrangements stimulate creative thinking without overwhelming attention (Ritter & Ferguson, 2017).

Jazz and improvisation: Jazz’s unpredictable nature and complexity can inspire creative thinking, though personal preference matters significantly (Ritter & Ferguson, 2017).

Electronic and downtempo: Artists like Bonobo, Tycho, and Emancipator blend complexity with repetitive elements that maintain engagement during creative work.

Music in major keys: Major key music tends to induce positive mood more reliably than minor keys, and positive mood enhances creative thinking (Isen et al., 1987).

Music for Repetitive and Administrative Tasks

When work is routine, data entry, email management, or other low-cognitive-demand activities, music serves different purposes—primarily motivation and mood enhancement.

Why Repetitive Tasks Benefit Most from Music

Monotonous work often leads to mind-wandering, boredom, and decreased motivation. Music provides stimulation that maintains engagement and creates a more pleasant work experience (Lesiuk, 2005).

For repetitive tasks, cognitive interference from complex music matters less because the work itself demands minimal attention.

Best Music for Routine Tasks

Energetic and upbeat: Higher tempo music (120-140 BPM) increases arousal and energy, helping maintain motivation during boring tasks (Karageorghis & Priest, 2012).

Personal favorites: For low-demand work, listening to music you love provides maximum mood enhancement without concerning interference effects (Lesiuk, 2005).

Lyrics are acceptable: Since repetitive tasks rarely involve language processing, lyrical music doesn’t create the same interference seen with complex cognitive work (Furnham & Bradley, 1997).

Optimal Genres for Routine Work

Research on software developers shows that programmers perform routine coding tasks more efficiently with familiar, preferred music, while complex problem-solving benefits from silence or instrumental music (Lesiuk, 2005).

When Silence Beats Any Playlist

Despite music’s benefits, specific situations demand silence or near-silence for optimal performance.

Tasks That Require Silence

Learning new material: When acquiring novel information, especially verbal content, silence significantly outperforms any music condition (Furnham & Bradley, 1997).

Reading comprehension: Music—particularly with lyrics—impairs reading comprehension and retention. Even instrumental music can interfere with complex reading (Martin et al., 1988).

Problem-solving requiring verbal reasoning: Mathematical word problems, logical reasoning, and verbal puzzles all suffer under music conditions (Perham & Currie, 2014).

Memorization and recall: Encoding new memories works better in silence, as does retrieval of previously learned information (Ferreri & Rodriguez-Fornells, 2017).

The Introvert-Extravert Divide

Personality significantly moderates music’s impact on work performance. Introverts show greater performance decrements under music conditions (especially complex or loud music) compared to extraverts, who often thrive with musical stimulation (Furnham & Bradley, 1997).

If you identify as introverted and find music distracting even when following “optimal” recommendations, trust your experience—silence likely serves you better for most work.

Distractibility and ADHD Considerations

Individuals with ADHD or high trait distractibility show mixed responses to background music. Some find that music provides necessary stimulation to prevent mind-wandering, while others experience additional distraction (Doyle & Furnham, 2012).

If you have ADHD, experiment systematically: try binaural beats, white noise, instrumental music, and silence across different tasks to identify your optimal conditions.

The Volume Question: How Loud Should Work Music Be?

Volume substantially impacts music’s effects on cognitive performance, independent of genre or complexity.

Research on Optimal Volume

Studies consistently show that moderate volume levels (50-60 decibels—roughly the volume of normal conversation) support focus better than loud music (above 75 decibels), which impairs concentration and increases stress (Mehta et al., 2012).

Interestingly, very quiet background music (below 40 decibels) provides minimal benefit, as it fails to mask environmental distractions effectively.

The Sweet Spot

For most people in most situations, music should be audible but not demanding attention—you should notice it if you actively listen, but it should fade into the background during focus.

If you find yourself singing along, turning up the volume, or actively listening to the music, it’s probably too engaging or too loud for optimal concentration.

Music Streaming Strategies for Work

Translating research into practical playlist creation requires understanding what to look for and avoid.

Curated Playlists vs. Algorithms

Pre-made “focus” and “deep work” playlists on Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube often incorporate research-backed principles: instrumental music, consistent tempo, minimal variation.

However, algorithmic recommendations based on your listening history may suggest songs you love but that are too engaging for concentration.

Creating Your Own Work Playlists

Length matters: Create playlists lasting at least 2-3 hours to minimize disruption from frequently changing songs or playlist repeats. Repetition of the same 30-minute playlist becomes noticeable and potentially distracting (Shih et al., 2009).

Remove outliers: Even within appropriate genres, individual songs may have dynamic swells, sudden tempo changes, or memorable hooks that grab attention. Ruthlessly eliminate these from work playlists.

Separate playlists by task type: Maintain distinct playlists for deep focus work, creative projects, and routine tasks rather than using the same music regardless of work demands.

Test and refine: Track which playlists correlate with your best work sessions. Productivity and focus are the metrics that matter, not aesthetic preference.

Specific Playlist Recommendations

For analytical work: Search for “deep focus,” “study music,” “coding music,” or specific classical periods like “Baroque for studying.”

For creative work: Try “creative flow,” “indie focus,” “downtempo electronica,” or “jazz for working.”

For routine tasks: Your personal favorites playlist will likely work well, or search “feel-good,” “mood booster,” or “energy” playlists.

Binaural Beats and Specialized Audio

Beyond traditional music, some audio technologies claim to enhance cognitive function through specific acoustic properties.

What Are Binaural Beats?

Binaural beats present slightly different frequencies to each ear (e.g., 200 Hz in the left ear, 210 Hz in the right ear). Your brain perceives the difference (10 Hz in this example) as a rhythmic pulse (Oster, 1973).

Proponents claim that binaural beats can entrain brainwaves to specific frequencies associated with different mental states: beta waves (13-30 Hz) for focus, alpha waves (8-13 Hz) for relaxed alertness, theta waves (4-8 Hz) for creativity.

Does the Science Support Binaural Beats?

Research shows mixed results. Some studies demonstrate modest improvements in attention, memory, and mood from binaural beats, while others find no significant effects beyond placebo (Garcia-Argibay et al., 2019).

A meta-analysis concluded that binaural beats may provide small benefits for memory and attention tasks but that effect sizes are small and highly variable between individuals (Garcia-Argibay et al., 2019).

If you find binaural beats helpful, they’re unlikely to cause harm and may provide placebo benefits even if direct neurological entrainment remains questionable. However, they’re not a magic solution backed by robust evidence.

White Noise, Pink Noise, and Brown Noise

White noise contains all frequencies at equal intensity—like static. It effectively masks environmental sounds and may benefit people with ADHD or high distractibility (Söderlund et al., 2007).

Pink noise emphasizes lower frequencies, creating a more balanced sound similar to rainfall. Some research suggests pink noise may enhance deep sleep and memory consolidation, though evidence for work performance benefits remains limited (Papalambros et al., 2017).

Brown noise emphasizes even lower frequencies than pink noise, creating a deep, rumbling sound. It’s primarily useful for masking low-frequency environmental noise and creating a sense of calm.

All three provide non-linguistic, predictable audio that won’t interfere with cognitive tasks and may help individuals who find even instrumental music too engaging.

Individual Differences: Finding Your Personal Formula

Research provides general principles, but individual variation means your optimal music choices require personal experimentation.

Factors That Influence Your Ideal Music

Musical training: People with musical backgrounds often find music more distracting during complex work because they can’t help analyzing musical structure (Patston & Tippett, 2011).

Personality: Beyond the introvert-extravert dimension, trait anxiety, openness to experience, and sensation-seeking all influence music preferences and tolerance during work (Chamorro-Premuzic & Furnham, 2007).

Task familiarity: Novel tasks require more cognitive resources, making music more likely to impair performance. Familiar tasks tolerate—or benefit from—musical accompaniment (Lesiuk, 2005).

Current mood and energy: When you’re already energized, calming music may optimize performance. When you’re fatigued, stimulating music may help maintain engagement (Karageorghis & Priest, 2012).

Environmental noise: In loud environments, music serves primarily as noise-masking rather than cognitive enhancement. In quiet spaces, music’s direct effects on cognition matter more.

Conducting Your Own Music Experiments

Baseline period: Work without music for several sessions, tracking productivity, focus quality, and task completion.

Systematic variation: Test different music types (instrumental, classical, ambient, etc.) for the same task type across multiple sessions.

Match music to task: Try different music for analytical work, creative work, and routine tasks rather than assuming one approach works universally.

Track outcomes: Note which conditions produced your best work, fastest completion times, and greatest subjective focus.

Consider time of day: Your optimal music choices may differ between morning and afternoon work sessions.

Implementing Music Strategy at Work

Translating knowledge into practice requires thoughtful implementation, especially in shared work environments.

Headphone Considerations

Open-back vs. closed-back: Closed-back headphones provide better isolation but may feel more fatiguing during extended use. Open-back offers comfort but allows environmental noise interference (and disturbs nearby colleagues).

Noise-canceling technology: Active noise cancellation can significantly enhance focus in noisy environments by eliminating distracting sounds before adding music. However, some people find the noise-canceling sensation uncomfortable (Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska et al., 2014).

Comfort for extended wear: If your headphones cause discomfort after 30 minutes, you’ll avoid using them even when music would benefit your work.

Social and Professional Considerations

Respect office norms: In collaborative environments, wearing headphones constantly may signal unavailability. Establish clear communication about when you’re in deep focus mode versus available for interaction.

Take listening breaks: Even at moderate volumes, extended headphone use can contribute to listening fatigue or long-term hearing concerns. Take periodic breaks from both music and headphones.

Meetings and collaboration: Remove headphones when others approach, during meetings, and any time communication matters. Missing important information because of music defeats productivity gains.

Common Music-for-Work Mistakes

Understanding what doesn’t work helps avoid productivity pitfalls.

Mistake 1: Using Music with Lyrics for Writing Tasks

Lyrics compete directly with linguistic processing required for writing, reading, and verbal reasoning. Even if you think you’re not paying attention to the words, they impair performance on language-based tasks (Perham & Currie, 2014).

Mistake 2: Volume Too High

Loud music becomes a stressor rather than a focus aid. If you notice tension, reduced concentration, or fatigue, lower the volume before abandoning music entirely.

Mistake 3: Playlist Curation Neglect

Allowing streaming algorithms to select songs based on general preferences will eventually serve up highly engaging tracks that derail focus. Actively curate work-specific playlists rather than relying on automated suggestions.

Mistake 4: Confusing Pleasure with Productivity

Music that makes you feel good doesn’t necessarily help you work better. Your favorite songs may boost mood while simultaneously destroying concentration. Separate pleasure listening from productivity listening.

Mistake 5: Ignoring Task Switching

Different cognitive demands require different auditory environments. Using the same music for analytical work, creative brainstorming, and routine tasks ignores fundamental differences in how music affects various cognitive processes.

Mistake 6: Never Trying Silence

If you always work with music, you may not realize that silence would serve you better for certain tasks. Regularly test silence conditions to ensure music genuinely helps rather than being an unexamined habit.

The Future of Music for Cognitive Enhancement

Emerging research and technology suggest new approaches to optimizing music for work performance.

AI-Generated Focus Music

Companies like Endel and Brain.fm use algorithms to generate endless streams of music specifically designed to enhance focus, relaxation, or sleep based on circadian rhythms, weather, and activity type (Brain.fm, 2021).

While proprietary and not yet extensively validated through independent research, early studies suggest algorithm-generated functional music may provide benefits beyond generic playlists.

Personalized Music Recommendations

Machine learning approaches that analyze your work patterns, task types, and performance metrics could theoretically generate personalized music recommendations optimized for your specific cognitive profile and current task.

This technology remains largely theoretical but represents a logical evolution of workplace productivity tools.

Neurological Monitoring Integration

Combining real-time EEG monitoring with adaptive music selection could allow systems to detect when your attention wanes and automatically adjust music characteristics to restore focus.

While currently impractical for most work contexts, such integration may become viable as neurological monitoring technology becomes less intrusive.

Bottom Line: Your Personalized Music Strategy

After reviewing decades of research on music and cognitive performance, several clear principles emerge alongside recognition that individual differences matter enormously.

Strong evidence supports:

Use instrumental music with consistent tempo and minimal variation for:

Use engaging, upbeat music for:

Consider silence for:

Your action plan:

  1. Audit your current approach: Track what music you use for which tasks and how effective you feel.
  2. Create task-specific playlists: Develop separate playlists for deep analytical work, creative projects, and routine tasks based on the principles outlined above.
  3. Experiment systematically: Test different approaches across similar tasks, noting which conditions produce your best work.
  4. Monitor volume: Keep work music at conversational levels—audible but not attention-demanding.
  5. Build in silence: Regularly work without music to ensure it genuinely helps rather than being an unexamined habit.
  6. Respect task transitions: Switch music styles (or to silence) when changing between different types of work.

The research is clear: music can enhance work performance, but only when matched appropriately to task demands and individual preferences. Your optimal music strategy requires understanding general principles, knowing yourself, and maintaining willingness to experiment. The playlist your brain actually wants isn’t necessarily the one you enjoy most—but finding it can transform your productivity and work experience.

===================================================================

REFERENCES

Brain.fm. (2021). Science-backed music to help you focus. Retrieved from https://www.brain.fm/science

Chabris, C. F. (1999). Prelude or requiem for the ‘Mozart effect’? Nature, 400(6747), 826-827.
DOI: 10.1038/23608

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2007). Personality and music: Can traits explain how people use music in everyday life? British Journal of Psychology, 98(2), 175-185.
DOI: 10.1348/000712606X111177

Doyle, M., & Furnham, A. (2012). The distracting effects of music on the cognitive test performance of creative and non-creative individuals. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 1-7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2011.09.002

Eno, B. (1978). Music for Airports [Album]. Polydor Records.

Ferreri, L., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2017). Music-related reward responses predict episodic memory performance. Experimental Brain Research, 235(12), 3721-3731.
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5095-0

Furnham, A., & Bradley, A. (1997). Music while you work: The differential distraction of background music on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extraverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(5), 445-455.
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0720(199710)11:5<445::AID-ACP472>3.0.CO;2-R

Garcia-Argibay, M., Santed, M. A., & Reales, J. M. (2019). Binaural auditory beats affect long-term memory. Psychological Research, 83(6), 1124-1136.
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0959-2

Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122-1131.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122

Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., & Nicholls, A. P. (1999). The phonological store of working memory: Is it phonological and is it a store? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1527-1542.
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1527

Kämpfe, J., Sedlmeier, P., & Renkewitz, F. (2011). The impact of background music on adult listeners: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Music, 39(4), 424-448.
DOI: 10.1177/0305735610376261

Karageorghis, C. I., & Priest, D. L. (2012). Music in the exercise domain: A review and synthesis (Part I). International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5(1), 44-66.
DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2011.631026

Krause, A. E., Dimmock, J., Rebar, A. L., & Jackson, B. (2019). Music listening predicted improved life satisfaction in university students during early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 631033.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.631033

Lesiuk, T. (2005). The effect of music listening on work performance. Psychology of Music, 33(2), 173-191.
DOI: 10.1177/0305735605050650

Martin, R. C., Wogalter, M. S., & Forlano, J. G. (1988). Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 382-398.
DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90063-0

Mehta, R., Zhu, R., & Cheema, A. (2012). Is noise always bad? Exploring the effects of ambient noise on creative cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 784-799.
DOI: 10.1086/665048

Oster, G. (1973). Auditory beats in the brain. Scientific American, 229(4), 94-102.
DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican1073-94

Papalambros, N. A., Santostasi, G., Malkani, R. G., Braun, R., Weintraub, S., Paller, K. A., & Zee, P. C. (2017). Acoustic enhancement of sleep slow oscillations and concomitant memory improvement in older adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 109.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00109

Patston, L. L., & Tippett, L. J. (2011). The effect of background music on cognitive performance in musicians and nonmusicians. Music Perception, 29(2), 173-183.
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2011.29.2.173

Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska, M., Dudarewicz, A., Zaborowski, K., Zamojska-Daniszewska, M., & Waszkowska, M. (2014). Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions. Noise and Health, 16(73), 315-321.
DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.144387

Perham, N., & Currie, H. (2014). Does listening to preferred music improve reading comprehension performance? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 279-284.
DOI: 10.1002/acp.2994

Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L., & Ky, K. N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365(6447), 611.
DOI: 10.1038/365611a0

Ritter, S. M., & Ferguson, S. (2017). Happy creativity: Listening to happy music facilitates divergent thinking. PloS One, 12(9), e0182210.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182210

Saadatmand, V., Rejeh, N., Heravi-Karimooi, M., Tadrisi, S. D., Zayeri, F., Vaismoradi, M., & Jasper, M. (2013). Effect of nature-based sounds’ intervention on agitation, anxiety, and stress in patients under mechanical ventilator support: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(7), 895-904.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.018

Salimpoor, V. N., Benovoy, M., Larcher, K., Dagher, A., & Zatorre, R. J. (2011). Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 257-262.
DOI: 10.1038/nn.2726

Shih, Y. N., Huang, R. H., & Chiang, H. Y. (2009). Correlation between work concentration level and background music: A pilot study. Work, 33(3), 329-333.
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0880

Söderlund, G., Sikström, S., & Smart, A. (2007). Listen to the noise: Noise is beneficial for cognitive performance in ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(8), 840-847.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01749.x

Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., & Letnic, A. K. (2012). Fast and loud background music disrupts reading comprehension. Psychology of Music, 40(6), 700-708.
DOI: 10.1177/0305735611400173

Zehnder, S. M., & Lipscomb, S. D. (2006). The role of music in video games. In K. Collins (Ed.), Playing With Sound: A Theory of Interacting with Sound and Music in Video Games (pp. 241-258). MIT Press.